Android签名机制之---签名验证过程详解
一、前言
今天是元旦,也是Single Dog的嚎叫之日,只能写博客来祛除寂寞了,今天我们继续来看一下Android中的签名机制的姊妹篇:Android中是如何验证一个Apk的签名。在前一篇文章中我们介绍了,Android中是如何对程序进行签名的,不了解的同学可以转战:
http://blog.csdn.net/jiangwei0910410003/article/details/50402000
当然在了解我们今天说到的知识点,这篇文章也是需要了解的,不然会有些知识点有些困惑的。
二、知识摘要
在我们没有开始这篇文章之前,我们回顾一下之前说到的签名机制流程:
1、对Apk中的每个文件做一次算法(数据摘要+Base64编码),保存到MANIFEST.MF文件中
2、对MANIFEST.MF整个文件做一次算法(数据摘要+Base64编码),存放到CERT.SF文件的头属性中,在对MANIFEST.MF文件中各个属性块做一次算法(数据摘要+Base64编码),存到到一个属性块中。
3、对CERT.SF文件做签名,内容存档到CERT.RSA中
所以通过上面的流程可以知道,我们今天来验证签名流程也是这三个步骤
三、代码分析
我们既然要了解Android中的应用程序的签名验证过程的话,那么我们肯定需要从一个类来开始看起,那就是PackageManagerService.java,因为这个类是Apk在安装的过程中核心类:frameworks\base\services\core\java\com\android\server\pm\PackageManagerService.java
private void installPackageLI(InstallArgs args, PackageInstalledInfo res) { …… PackageParser pp = new PackageParser(); …… try { pp.collectCertificates(pkg, parseFlags); pp.collectManifestDigest(pkg); } catch (PackageParserException e) { res.setError("Failed collect during installPackageLI", e); return; } ……
我们可以看到,有一个核心类:PackageParser frameworks\base\core\java\android\content\pm\PackageParser.java
这个类也是见名知意,就是需要解析Apk包,那么就会涉及到签名信息了,下面我们就从这个类开始入手:
import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_BAD_MANIFEST;import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_BAD_PACKAGE_NAME;import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_CERTIFICATE_ENCODING;import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_INCONSISTENT_CERTIFICATES;import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_MANIFEST_MALFORMED;import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NOT_APK;import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NO_CERTIFICATES;import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_UNEXPECTED_EXCEPTION;
我们看到了几个我们很熟悉的信息:
import static android.content.pm.PackageManager.INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NO_CERTIFICATES;
这个是在安装apk包的时候出现的错误,没有证书:
那么我们就先来查找一下这个字段:
private static void collectCertificates(Package pkg, File apkFile, int flags)throws PackageParserException {final String apkPath = apkFile.getAbsolutePath();StrictJarFile jarFile = null;try {jarFile = new StrictJarFile(apkPath);// Always verify manifest, regardless of sourcefinal ZipEntry manifestEntry = jarFile.findEntry(ANDROID_MANIFEST_FILENAME);if (manifestEntry == null) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_BAD_MANIFEST,"Package " + apkPath + " has no manifest");}final List toVerify = new ArrayList<>();toVerify.add(manifestEntry);// If we're parsing an untrusted package, verify all contentsif ((flags & PARSE_IS_SYSTEM) == 0) {final Iterator i = jarFile.iterator();while (i.hasNext()) {final ZipEntry entry = i.next();if (entry.isDirectory()) continue;if (entry.getName().startsWith("META-INF/")) continue;if (entry.getName().equals(ANDROID_MANIFEST_FILENAME)) continue;toVerify.add(entry);}}// Verify that entries are signed consistently with the first entry// we encountered. Note that for splits, certificates may have// already been populated during an earlier parse of a base APK.for (ZipEntry entry : toVerify) {final Certificate[][] entryCerts = loadCertificates(jarFile, entry);if (ArrayUtils.isEmpty(entryCerts)) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NO_CERTIFICATES,"Package " + apkPath + " has no certificates at entry "+ entry.getName());}final Signature[] entrySignatures = convertToSignatures(entryCerts);if (pkg.mCertificates == null) {pkg.mCertificates = entryCerts;pkg.mSignatures = entrySignatures;pkg.mSigningKeys = new ArraySet();for (int i=0; i < entryCerts.length; i++) {pkg.mSigningKeys.add(entryCerts[i][0].getPublicKey());}} else {if (!Signature.areExactMatch(pkg.mSignatures, entrySignatures)) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_INCONSISTENT_CERTIFICATES, "Package " + apkPath+ " has mismatched certificates at entry "+ entry.getName());}}}} catch (GeneralSecurityException e) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_CERTIFICATE_ENCODING,"Failed to collect certificates from " + apkPath, e);} catch (IOException | RuntimeException e) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NO_CERTIFICATES,"Failed to collect certificates from " + apkPath, e);} finally {closeQuietly(jarFile);}}
这里看到了,当有异常的时候就会提示这个信息,我们在跟进去看看: // Verify that entries are signed consistently with the first entry// we encountered. Note that for splits, certificates may have// already been populated during an earlier parse of a base APK.for (ZipEntry entry : toVerify) {final Certificate[][] entryCerts = loadCertificates(jarFile, entry);if (ArrayUtils.isEmpty(entryCerts)) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_NO_CERTIFICATES,"Package " + apkPath + " has no certificates at entry "+ entry.getName());}final Signature[] entrySignatures = convertToSignatures(entryCerts);if (pkg.mCertificates == null) {pkg.mCertificates = entryCerts;pkg.mSignatures = entrySignatures;pkg.mSigningKeys = new ArraySet();for (int i=0; i < entryCerts.length; i++) {pkg.mSigningKeys.add(entryCerts[i][0].getPublicKey());}} else {if (!Signature.areExactMatch(pkg.mSignatures, entrySignatures)) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_INCONSISTENT_CERTIFICATES, "Package " + apkPath+ " has mismatched certificates at entry "+ entry.getName());}}}
这里有一个重要的方法:loadCertificates
private static Certificate[][] loadCertificates(StrictJarFile jarFile, ZipEntry entry)throws PackageParserException {InputStream is = null;try {// We must read the stream for the JarEntry to retrieve// its certificates.is = jarFile.getInputStream(entry);readFullyIgnoringContents(is);return jarFile.getCertificateChains(entry);} catch (IOException | RuntimeException e) {throw new PackageParserException(INSTALL_PARSE_FAILED_UNEXPECTED_EXCEPTION,"Failed reading " + entry.getName() + " in " + jarFile, e);} finally {IoUtils.closeQuietly(is);}}
这个方法是加载证书内容的 1、验证Apk中的每个文件的算法(数据摘要+Base64编码)和MANIFEST.MF文件中的对应属性块内容是否配对
首先获取StrictJarFile文件中的InputStream对象
StrictJarFile这个类:libcore\luni\src\main\java\java\util\jar\StrictJarFile.java
public InputStream getInputStream(ZipEntry ze) {final InputStream is = getZipInputStream(ze);if (isSigned) {JarVerifier.VerifierEntry entry = verifier.initEntry(ze.getName());if (entry == null) {return is;}return new JarFile.JarFileInputStream(is, ze.getSize(), entry);}return is;}
1》获取到VerifierEntry对象entry
在JarVerifier.java:libcore\luni\src\main\java\java\util\jar\JarVerifier.java
VerifierEntry initEntry(String name) {// If no manifest is present by the time an entry is found,// verification cannot occur. If no signature files have// been found, do not verify.if (manifest == null || signatures.isEmpty()) {return null;}Attributes attributes = manifest.getAttributes(name);// entry has no digestif (attributes == null) {return null;}ArrayList certChains = new ArrayList();Iterator>> it = signatures.entrySet().iterator();while (it.hasNext()) {Map.Entry> entry = it.next();HashMap hm = entry.getValue();if (hm.get(name) != null) {// Found an entry for entry name in .SF fileString signatureFile = entry.getKey();Certificate[] certChain = certificates.get(signatureFile);if (certChain != null) {certChains.add(certChain);}}}// entry is not signedif (certChains.isEmpty()) {return null;}Certificate[][] certChainsArray = certChains.toArray(new Certificate[certChains.size()][]);for (int i = 0; i < DIGEST_ALGORITHMS.length; i++) {final String algorithm = DIGEST_ALGORITHMS[i];final String hash = attributes.getValue(algorithm + "-Digest");if (hash == null) {continue;}byte[] hashBytes = hash.getBytes(StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1);try {return new VerifierEntry(name, MessageDigest.getInstance(algorithm), hashBytes,certChainsArray, verifiedEntries);} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException ignored) {}}return null;}
就是构造一个VerifierEntry对象: /** * Stores and a hash and a message digest and verifies that massage digest * matches the hash. */static class VerifierEntry extends OutputStream {private final String name;private final MessageDigest digest;private final byte[] hash;private final Certificate[][] certChains;private final Hashtable verifiedEntries;VerifierEntry(String name, MessageDigest digest, byte[] hash,Certificate[][] certChains, Hashtable verifedEntries) {this.name = name;this.digest = digest;this.hash = hash;this.certChains = certChains;this.verifiedEntries = verifedEntries;}/** * Updates a digest with one byte. */ @Override public void write(int value) {digest.update((byte) value); } /** * Updates a digest with byte array. */ @Override public void write(byte[] buf, int off, int nbytes) { digest.update(buf, off, nbytes); } /** * Verifies that the digests stored in the manifest match the decrypted * digests from the .SF file. This indicates the validity of the * signing, not the integrity of the file, as its digest must be * calculated and verified when its contents are read. * * @throws SecurityException * if the digest value stored in the manifest does not * agree with the decrypted digest as recovered from the * .SF
file. */ void verify() { byte[] d = digest.digest(); if (!MessageDigest.isEqual(d, Base64.decode(hash))) { throw invalidDigest(JarFile.MANIFEST_NAME, name, name); } verifiedEntries.put(name, certChains); }}
要构造这个对象,必须事先准备好参数。第一个参数很简单,就是要验证的文件名,直接将name传进来就好了。第二个参数是计算摘要的对象,可以通过MessageDigest.getInstance获得,不过要先告知到底要用哪个摘要算法,同样也是通过查看MANIFEST.MF文件中对应名字的属性值来决定的: 所以可以知道所用的摘要算法是SHA1。第三个参数是对应文件的摘要值,这是通过读取MANIFEST.MF文件获得的:
第四个参数是证书链,即对该apk文件签名的所有证书链信息。为什么是二维数组呢?这是因为Android允许用多个证书对apk进行签名,但是它们的证书文件名必须不同,这个知识点,我在之前的一篇文章中:签名过程详解 中有提到。
最后一个参数是已经验证过的文件列表,VerifierEntry在完成了对指定文件的摘要验证之后会将该文件的信息加到其中。
static final class JarFileInputStream extends FilterInputStream {private long count;private ZipEntry zipEntry;private JarVerifier.VerifierEntry entry;private boolean done = false;JarFileInputStream(InputStream is, ZipEntry ze,JarVerifier.VerifierEntry e) {super(is);zipEntry = ze;count = zipEntry.getSize();entry = e;}@Overridepublic int read() throws IOException {if (done) {return -1;}if (count > 0) {int r = super.read();if (r != -1) {entry.write(r);count--;} else {count = 0;}if (count == 0) {done = true;entry.verify();}return r;} else {done = true;entry.verify();return -1;}}@Overridepublic int read(byte[] buf, int off, int nbytes) throws IOException {if (done) {return -1;}if (count > 0) {int r = super.read(buf, off, nbytes);if (r != -1) {int size = r;if (count < size) {size = (int) count;}entry.write(buf, off, size);count -= size;} else {count = 0;}if (count == 0) {done = true;entry.verify();}return r;} else {done = true;entry.verify();return -1;}}@Overridepublic int available() throws IOException {if (done) {return 0;}return super.available();}@Overridepublic long skip(long byteCount) throws IOException {return Streams.skipByReading(this, byteCount);}}
public static long readFullyIgnoringContents(InputStream in) throws IOException {byte[] buffer = sBuffer.getAndSet(null);if (buffer == null) {buffer = new byte[4096];}int n = 0;int count = 0;while ((n = in.read(buffer, 0, buffer.length)) != -1) {count += n;}sBuffer.set(buffer);return count;}
得到第二步之后的一个InputStream对象,然后就开始read操作,这里我没发现什么猫腻,但是我们从第一件事做完之后可以发现,这里的InputStream对象其实是JarInputStream,所以我们可以去看一下他的read方法的实现: 玄机原来在这里,这里的JarFileInputStream.read确实会调用其父类的read读取指定的apk内文件的内容,并且将其传给JarVerifier.VerifierEntry.write函数。当文件读完后,会接着调用JarVerifier.VerifierEntry.verify函数对其进行验证。JarVerifier.VerifierEntry.write函数非常简单:
就是将读到的文件的内容传给digest,这个digest就是前面在构造JarVerifier.VerifierEntry传进来的,对应于在MANIFEST.MF文件中指定的摘要算法。万事具备,接下来想要验证就很简单了:
通过digest就可以算出apk内指定文件的真实摘要值。而记录在MANIFEST.MF文件中对应该文件的摘要值,也在构造JarVerifier.VerifierEntry时传递给了hash变量。不过这个hash值是经过Base64编码的。所以在比较之前,必须通过Base64解码。如果不一致的话,会抛出SecurityException异常:
private static SecurityException invalidDigest(String signatureFile, String name,String jarName) {throw new SecurityException(signatureFile + " has invalid digest for " + name +" in " + jarName);}
到这里我们就分析了,Android中是如何验证MANIFEST.MF文件中的内容的,我们这里再来看一下,这里抛出异常出去:
这里捕获到异常之后,会在抛异常出去:
在这里就会抛出异常信息,所以如果我们修改了一个Apk中的一个文件内容的话,这里肯定是安装不上的。
2、验证CERT.SF文件的签名信息和CERT.RSA中的内容是否一致
1》我们就来看看StrictJarFile中的getCertificateChains方法:
/** * Return all certificate chains for a given {@link ZipEntry} belonging to this jar. * This method MUST be called only after fully exhausting the InputStream belonging * to this entry. * * Returns {@code null} if this jar file isn't signed or if this method is * called before the stream is processed. */public Certificate[][] getCertificateChains(ZipEntry ze) {if (isSigned) {return verifier.getCertificateChains(ze.getName());}return null;}
这里有一个变量判断:isSigned,他是在构造方法中赋值的: public StrictJarFile(String fileName) throws IOException {this.nativeHandle = nativeOpenJarFile(fileName);this.raf = new RandomAccessFile(fileName, "r");try {// Read the MANIFEST and signature files up front and try to// parse them. We never want to accept a JAR File with broken signatures// or manifests, so it's best to throw as early as possible.HashMap metaEntries = getMetaEntries();this.manifest = new Manifest(metaEntries.get(JarFile.MANIFEST_NAME), true);this.verifier = new JarVerifier(fileName, manifest, metaEntries);isSigned = verifier.readCertificates() && verifier.isSignedJar();} catch (IOException ioe) {nativeClose(this.nativeHandle);throw ioe;}guard.open("close");}
去verifier中看看这两个方法: /** * If the associated JAR file is signed, check on the validity of all of the * known signatures. * * @return {@code true} if the associated JAR is signed and an internal * check verifies the validity of the signature(s). {@code false} if * the associated JAR file has no entries at all in its {@code * META-INF} directory. This situation is indicative of an invalid * JAR file. * * Will also return {@code true} if the JAR file is not * signed. * @throws SecurityException * if the JAR file is signed and it is determined that a * signature block file contains an invalid signature for the * corresponding signature file. */synchronized boolean readCertificates() {if (metaEntries.isEmpty()) {return false;}Iterator it = metaEntries.keySet().iterator();while (it.hasNext()) {String key = it.next();if (key.endsWith(".DSA") || key.endsWith(".RSA") || key.endsWith(".EC")) {verifyCertificate(key);it.remove();}}return true;}
这个方法其实很简单,就是判断metaEntries中是否为空,说白了,就是判断Apk中的META-INF文件夹中是否为空,只有文件就返回true。再来看看isSignedJar方法: /** * Returns a boolean
indication of whether or not the * associated jar file is signed. * * @return {@code true} if the JAR is signed, {@code false} * otherwise. */boolean isSignedJar() {return certificates.size() > 0;}
这个方法直接判断certificates这个集合是否为空。我们全局搜索一下这个集合在哪里存入的数据的地方,找到了verifyCertificate方法,同时我们发现,在上面的readCertificates方法中,就调用了这个方法,其实这个方法就是读取证书信息的。 下面来看一下verifyCertificate方法:
/** * @param certFile */private void verifyCertificate(String certFile) {// Found Digital Sig, .SF should already have been readString signatureFile = certFile.substring(0, certFile.lastIndexOf('.')) + ".SF";byte[] sfBytes = metaEntries.get(signatureFile);if (sfBytes == null) {return;}byte[] manifestBytes = metaEntries.get(JarFile.MANIFEST_NAME);// Manifest entry is required for any verifications.if (manifestBytes == null) {return;}byte[] sBlockBytes = metaEntries.get(certFile);try {Certificate[] signerCertChain = JarUtils.verifySignature(new ByteArrayInputStream(sfBytes),new ByteArrayInputStream(sBlockBytes));if (signerCertChain != null) {certificates.put(signatureFile, signerCertChain);}} catch (IOException e) {return;} catch (GeneralSecurityException e) {throw failedVerification(jarName, signatureFile);}// Verify manifest hash in .sf fileAttributes attributes = new Attributes();HashMap entries = new HashMap();try {ManifestReader im = new ManifestReader(sfBytes, attributes);im.readEntries(entries, null);} catch (IOException e) {return;}// Do we actually have any signatures to look at?if (attributes.get(Attributes.Name.SIGNATURE_VERSION) == null) {return;}boolean createdBySigntool = false;String createdBy = attributes.getValue("Created-By");if (createdBy != null) {createdBySigntool = createdBy.indexOf("signtool") != -1;}// Use .SF to verify the mainAttributes of the manifest// If there is no -Digest-Manifest-Main-Attributes entry in .SF// file, such as those created before java 1.5, then we ignore// such verification.if (mainAttributesEnd > 0 && !createdBySigntool) {String digestAttribute = "-Digest-Manifest-Main-Attributes";if (!verify(attributes, digestAttribute, manifestBytes, 0, mainAttributesEnd, false, true)) {throw failedVerification(jarName, signatureFile);}}// Use .SF to verify the whole manifest.String digestAttribute = createdBySigntool ? "-Digest" : "-Digest-Manifest";if (!verify(attributes, digestAttribute, manifestBytes, 0, manifestBytes.length, false, false)) {Iterator> it = entries.entrySet().iterator();while (it.hasNext()) {Map.Entry entry = it.next();Manifest.Chunk chunk = manifest.getChunk(entry.getKey());if (chunk == null) {return;}if (!verify(entry.getValue(), "-Digest", manifestBytes,chunk.start, chunk.end, createdBySigntool, false)) {throw invalidDigest(signatureFile, entry.getKey(), jarName);}}}metaEntries.put(signatureFile, null);signatures.put(signatureFile, entries);}
2》获取证书信息,并且验证CERT.SF文件的签名信息和CERT.RSA中的内容是否一致。
// Found Digital Sig, .SF should already have been readString signatureFile = certFile.substring(0, certFile.lastIndexOf('.')) + ".SF";byte[] sfBytes = metaEntries.get(signatureFile);if (sfBytes == null) {return;}byte[] manifestBytes = metaEntries.get(JarFile.MANIFEST_NAME);// Manifest entry is required for any verifications.if (manifestBytes == null) {return;}byte[] sBlockBytes = metaEntries.get(certFile);try {Certificate[] signerCertChain = JarUtils.verifySignature(new ByteArrayInputStream(sfBytes),new ByteArrayInputStream(sBlockBytes));if (signerCertChain != null) {certificates.put(signatureFile, signerCertChain);}} catch (IOException e) {return;} catch (GeneralSecurityException e) {throw failedVerification(jarName, signatureFile);}
这里首先获取到,签名文件。我们在之前的一篇文章中说到了,签名文件和证书文件的名字是一样的。
同时这里还调用了JarUtils类:libcore\luni\src\main\java\org\apache\harmony\security\utils\JarUtils.java
中的verifySignature方法来获取证书,这里就不做太多的解释了,如何从一个RSA文件中获取证书,这样的代码网上也是有的,而且后面我会演示一下,如何获取。
/** * This method handle all the work with PKCS7, ASN1 encoding, signature verifying, * and certification path building. * See also PKCS #7: Cryptographic Message Syntax Standard: * http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2315.txt * @param signature - the input stream of signature file to be verified * @param signatureBlock - the input stream of corresponding signature block file * @return array of certificates used to verify the signature file * @throws IOException - if some errors occurs during reading from the stream * @throws GeneralSecurityException - if signature verification process fails */public static Certificate[] verifySignature(InputStream signature, InputStreamsignatureBlock) throws IOException, GeneralSecurityException {BerInputStream bis = new BerInputStream(signatureBlock);ContentInfo info = (ContentInfo)ContentInfo.ASN1.decode(bis);SignedData signedData = info.getSignedData();if (signedData == null) {throw new IOException("No SignedData found");}Collection encCerts= signedData.getCertificates();if (encCerts.isEmpty()) {return null;}X509Certificate[] certs = new X509Certificate[encCerts.size()];int i = 0;for (org.apache.harmony.security.x509.Certificate encCert : encCerts) {certs[i++] = new X509CertImpl(encCert);}List sigInfos = signedData.getSignerInfos();SignerInfo sigInfo;if (!sigInfos.isEmpty()) {sigInfo = sigInfos.get(0);} else {return null;}// IssuerX500Principal issuer = sigInfo.getIssuer();// Certificate serial numberBigInteger snum = sigInfo.getSerialNumber();// Locate the certificateint issuerSertIndex = 0;for (i = 0; i < certs.length; i++) {if (issuer.equals(certs[i].getIssuerDN()) &&snum.equals(certs[i].getSerialNumber())) {issuerSertIndex = i;break;}}if (i == certs.length) { // No issuer certificate foundreturn null;}if (certs[issuerSertIndex].hasUnsupportedCriticalExtension()) {throw new SecurityException("Can not recognize a critical extension");}// Get Signature instanceSignature sig = null;String da = sigInfo.getDigestAlgorithm();String dea = sigInfo.getDigestEncryptionAlgorithm();String alg = null;if (da != null && dea != null) {alg = da + "with" + dea;try {sig = Signature.getInstance(alg, OpenSSLProvider.PROVIDER_NAME);} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) {}}if (sig == null) {alg = da;if (alg == null) {return null;}try {sig = Signature.getInstance(alg, OpenSSLProvider.PROVIDER_NAME);} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) {return null;}}sig.initVerify(certs[issuerSertIndex]);......
这里返回的是一个证书的数组。
3、MANIFEST.MF整个文件签名在CERT.SF文件中头属性中的值是否匹配以及验证MANIFEST.MF文件中的各个属性块的签名在CERT.SF文件中是否匹配
// Use .SF to verify the mainAttributes of the manifest// If there is no -Digest-Manifest-Main-Attributes entry in .SF// file, such as those created before java 1.5, then we ignore// such verification.if (mainAttributesEnd > 0 && !createdBySigntool) {String digestAttribute = "-Digest-Manifest-Main-Attributes";if (!verify(attributes, digestAttribute, manifestBytes, 0, mainAttributesEnd, false, true)) {throw failedVerification(jarName, signatureFile);}}
这里的manifestBytes: byte[] manifestBytes = metaEntries.get(JarFile.MANIFEST_NAME);
就是MANIFEST.MF文件内容。继续看一下verify方法: private boolean verify(Attributes attributes, String entry, byte[] data,int start, int end, boolean ignoreSecondEndline, boolean ignorable) {for (int i = 0; i < DIGEST_ALGORITHMS.length; i++) {String algorithm = DIGEST_ALGORITHMS[i];String hash = attributes.getValue(algorithm + entry);if (hash == null) {continue;}MessageDigest md;try {md = MessageDigest.getInstance(algorithm);} catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException e) {continue;}if (ignoreSecondEndline && data[end - 1] == '\n' && data[end - 2] == '\n') {md.update(data, start, end - 1 - start);} else {md.update(data, start, end - start);}byte[] b = md.digest();byte[] hashBytes = hash.getBytes(StandardCharsets.ISO_8859_1);return MessageDigest.isEqual(b, Base64.decode(hashBytes));}return ignorable;}
这个方法其实很简单,就是验证传入的data数据块的数据摘要算法和传入的attributes中的算法块的值是否匹配,比如这里: String algorithm = DIGEST_ALGORITHMS[i];String hash = attributes.getValue(algorithm + entry);
这里的algorithm是算法: private static final String[] DIGEST_ALGORITHMS = new String[] {"SHA-512","SHA-384","SHA-256","SHA1",};
这里的entry也是传入的,我们看到传入的是:-Digest
这样就是CERT.SF文件中的一个条目:
2》第二件事是:验证MANIFEST.MF文件中的各个属性块的签名在CERT.SF文件中是否匹配
// Use .SF to verify the whole manifest.String digestAttribute = createdBySigntool ? "-Digest" : "-Digest-Manifest";if (!verify(attributes, digestAttribute, manifestBytes, 0, manifestBytes.length, false, false)) {Iterator> it = entries.entrySet().iterator();while (it.hasNext()) {Map.Entry entry = it.next();Manifest.Chunk chunk = manifest.getChunk(entry.getKey());if (chunk == null) {return;}if (!verify(entry.getValue(), "-Digest", manifestBytes,chunk.start, chunk.end, createdBySigntool, false)) {throw invalidDigest(signatureFile, entry.getKey(), jarName);}}}
这里我们可以看到也是同样调用verify方法来验证CERT.SF中的条目信息的。 最后我们再看一下是如何配对签名信息的,在PackageParser中的collectCertificates方法:
这里会比对已经安装的apk的签名和准备要安装的apk的签名是否一致,如果不一致的话,就会报错:
这个错,也是我们经常会遇到的,就是同样的apk,签名不一致导致的问题。
我们从上面的分析代码中可以看到,这里的Signature比对签名,其实就是比对证书中的公钥信息:
上面我们就看完了Android中验证签名信息的流程,下面我们再来梳理一下流程吧:
所有有关apk文件的签名验证工作都是在JarVerifier里面做的,一共分成三步:
1、JarVerifier.VerifierEntry.verify做了验证,即保证apk文件中包含的所有文件,对应的摘要值与MANIFEST.MF文件中记录的一致。
2、JarVeirifer.verifyCertificate使用证书文件(在META-INF目录下,以.DSA、.RSA或者.EC结尾的文件)检验签名文件(在META-INF目录下,和证书文件同名,但扩展名为.SF的文件)是没有被修改过的。这里我们可以注意到,Android中在验证的过程中对SF喝RSA文件的名字并不关心,这个在之前的 签名过程 文章中介绍到了。
3、JarVeirifer.verifyCertificate中使用签名文件CERT.SF,检验MANIFEST.MF文件中的内容也没有被篡改过
综上所述:
首先,如果你改变了apk包中的任何文件,那么在apk安装校验时,改变后的文件摘要信息与MANIFEST.MF的检验信息不同,于是验证失败,程序就不能成功安装。
其次,如果你对更改的过的文件相应的算出新的摘要值,然后更改MANIFEST.MF文件里面对应的属性值,那么必定与CERT.SF文件中算出的摘要值不一样,照样验证失败。
这里都会提示安装失败信息:
如果你还不死心,继续计算MANIFEST.MF的摘要值,相应的更改CERT.SF里面的值.
那么数字签名值必定与CERT.RSA文件中记录的不一样,还是失败。
这里的失败信息:
那么能不能继续伪造数字签名呢?不可能,因为没有数字证书对应的私钥。
所以,如果要重新打包后的应用程序能再Android设备上安装,必须对其进行重签名。
从上面的分析可以得出,只要修改了Apk中的任何内容,就必须重新签名,不然会提示安装失败,当然这里不会分析,后面一篇文章会注重分析为何会提示安装失败。
总结
到这里我们就介绍完了Android中的apk的签名验证过程,再结合之前的一篇文章,我们可以了解到了Android中的签名机制了。这个也是对Android中的安全机制的一个深入了解吧,新年快乐~~
《Android应用安全防护和逆向分析》
点击立即购买:京东 天猫
更多内容:点击这里
关注微信公众号,最新技术干货实时推送
编码美丽技术圈 微信扫一扫进入我的"技术圈"世界扫一扫加小编微信
添加时请注明:“编码美丽”非常感谢!
更多相关文章
- Android(安卓)adb不是内部或外部命令 问题解决
- Android(安卓)反编译apk 到java源码的方法
- android中ListView点击和ListView的item里面的button或ImageView
- 新手拥抱Android
- 理解 Android(安卓)Build 系统
- Android编译系统(一、环境与命令)
- android读写assets目录下面的资源文件(文件夹)
- Android(安卓)java.io.IOException异常情况整理
- NPM 和webpack 的基础使用